Cameras to travel with: the Fujifilm X-A3


My recent trip to New Orleans was what professional photographers call a great photo op. The architecture of the French Quarter, the Mississippi riverboats, the funky music scene — the whole city is a great subject. So I needed to take a camera that would go anywhere and give me great-looking photos, but wouldn’t weigh me down. My choice this time was the Fujifilm X-A3, a new, medium-priced mirrorless camera that offers good photo quality and has a little style to boot.

If you’re camera-savvy, you know that mirrorless cameras are the modern counterpart of the single-lens reflex, or SLR, cameras that once dominated high-end photography. They deliver similar-quality photos in a smaller, more streamlined package — just what you want for running around a new city, discovering new things.

I shot just about every type of subject over the course of a week in the Big Easy, and if you read this site, you’re seen a lot of the photos already. But as usual when I borrow a camera to travel with, I do an in-depth review for those who are interested. So here’s my take on the Fujifilm X-A3, the newest in Fuji’s longstanding line of stylish mirrorless cameras.

Looking at the camera

Fujifilm X-A3 frontThe Fujifilm X-A3 is built like an old-time rangefinder camera. In fact, it looks much like a vintage Leica, and Fuji has accentuated the look with a faux leather casing on the front and sides. The one I got was black, but it also comes in stylish brown and pink.

The X-A3 is smaller than an average SLR, but it’s not a tiny camera: it has a little heft to it, especially with the sizeable 24-75mm (equivalent) kit lens attached. There’s a small grip on the back and a bigger one on the front to make the camera easier to handle, though with my long fingers, I would have liked it to be larger.

The camera has a big, sharp, touch-screen monitor. You can use the touch function to zoom, focus and shoot photos with the tap of a finger. And the monitor tilts up or down – it even flips upside down so you can take selfies. There’s no viewfinder, however, so you’re going to be using the screen to take all of your shots. A cute little pop-flash comes in handy when shooting inside or at night.

Fujifilm X-A3 back

The X-A3 has a lot of manual controls, with a command dial on top and a sub-command dial on the back, to put the settings right under your thumb. And looking deeper, the camera has some serious specs for a model in this price range, starting with a potent, 24.2-megapixel APS-C-sized sensor.

There are full manual modes, plus Program and two special Auto modes, including Advanced SR Auto, which chooses the best scene mode for the picture you’re shooting. It also lets you use some of the camera’s other features, including special filters and film simulation modes, which mimicFujifilm X-A3 controls the look of the famous Fuji films like Velvia and Provia.

Pushing the “Q” button on the back brings up a very useful control screen (see photo above) that lets you adjust most of the common settings. It also lets you do some sophisticated things, like calibrating the highlight and shadow tones, colour and sharpness settings.

The camera also has five-axis image stabilization, with four different modes, to avoid blurry pictures from shaky hands. And there’s RAW format with in-camera file conversion for those who want to take top-quality images.

Here’s a page from the Fujifilm website if you want to see the camera’s full specs.

Shooting with the Fujifilm X-A3

I found the Fujifilm X-A3 to be a handy travel companion. While it’s not a tiny camera you can slip in your pocket, it was small enough to carry around without getting a sore shoulder. And the tilting screen let me shoot from high or low angles without doing contortions: I especially liked tilting it downward to shoot over crowds, like this one at a Mardi Gras parade. (Note: the photos below are just as they came from the camera, though some have been reduced in size to fit the screen. Click on the photos for a closer look.)

Fujifilm X-A3 parade

Importantly, the camera woke up fast when I needed it – I counted about one second. And it focused quickly in most situations, though it could hunt for a moment in low light. The focus engine worked well in most cases, though I did get a few surprisingly unsharp shots.

I used the Program mode for a lot of my photos, and it handled most light conditions well. When the lighting got tricky, I tried the SR Auto mode, and in most situations it came through with good results.

One of the trickiest challenges for a camera is taking food photos in restaurants – the artificial light tends to produce off colours that are hard to get rid of. But to its credit, the SR Auto mode nailed the white balance on this shot at the Red Fish restaurant in the French Quarter.

Fujifilm X-A3 food shot

Finally, the Fujifilm X-A3’s battery hung in like a trooper, compared to some of the other mirrorless cameras I’ve travelled with. In most cases, it was still chugging at the end of the day. and it charged up pretty quickly when I got back to the hotel.

Looking at the pictures

I came back from this trip with a lot of sharp, good-looking photos. My daylight shots were generally well-exposed, with excellent colour and lots of detail, even in trying conditions. I confined myself to standard settings, though I could have enhanced the colours in a dozen different ways using the camera’s special modes.

Fujifilm X-A3 houses

The real test is shooting in low-light conditions, however, and here the camera came through admirably. It produced some great-looking shots in the darkened streets of the French Quarter at night, with very little grainy “noise” in the shadow areas.

Fujifilm X-A3 NOLA night

It also did a nice job in indoor settings like the famous Oak Alley Plantation. However, as with many cameras, the Program mode tended to lower the shutter speed too much in low light, blurring any movement. I discovered later that the X-A3 allows you to set a minimum shutter speed and a maximum ISO value in Program – a very useful feature. Oh, well, next time …

Fujifilm X-A3 Oak Alley inside

The Fujifilm X-A3 shoots movies at 1080p and 720p, with a choice of 24, 50 and 60 frames per second (sorry, no 4K). And while I didn’t shoot many movies with it, I did capture some footage from a tour boat as we cruised through the Louisiana bayou. There’s even some Cajun background music.

The verdict

The Fujifilm X-A3 is a very capable travel companion. There’s not much this camera doesn’t do, and do pretty well, with its extensive list of features and customizable settings.

Of course, that also means you need to learn a little about the camera in order to get the most out of it. Exploring the “Q” menu is a good start, but you’ll also find a lot of other features in the menus, like wireless photo transfer and a dynamic range adjustment, to even out the highlights and shadows in contrasty lighting.

The shots in this post were taken with the kit lens, which performed well. But you can expand the camera’s reach with wider and longer lenses, depending on the type of shooting you do. Fuji has a good range of lenses, including prime lenses and longer zooms — though I don’t recommend shooting extreme telephoto without a viewfinder.

All in all, I’d recommend the Fuji X-A3 both for beginners and for more advanced photographers who want a versatile everyday camera. It checks all the boxes – and the classy looks are a bonus.


About Author

Paul Marshman is a retired journalist who spent 30 years as a writer and editor on Canadian newspapers, while travelling to the ends of the earth. Now he continues to travel while passing on his travel experiences to you.


  1. “The Fujifilm X-A3 is a very capable travel companion. There’s not much this camera doesn’t do, and do well, ”

    Really? Several of your samples shots are out of focus or lit poorly. This article feels like more of an ad for the camera. I wanted to like it, don’t get me wrong, but I can’t based on this presentation.

    • Yes, several of the shots are lit poorly — and that’s the point. I wanted to show what the camera can do in bad lighting as well as good. You’ll note that the daylight shots are very sharp. In the photos with poor lighting, the camera did indeed get a focus, but since I’ve used a wide aperture, the background is soft. In the case of the food photo, I was happy to get the blurred background for effect. The shot in the Oak Alley plantation house has some motion blur, which is my fault for not adjusting the Program setting to raise the shutter speed. But you’ll note the members of the tour group are sharp. I used Program for most of these shots because I think a lot users will do just that. But the camera has lots of manual settings to make the photos look the way you want.

    • Yes, it can be a big step to move from a professional-quality DSLR to a mirrorless camera. But unless you’re shooting for a magazine or some other professional assignment, a mirrorless gives you all the quality you need for your travels, and without the size and weight. I confess that I still do take my DSLR along with me sometimes, but I also bring a compact camera for those moments when I don’t feel like lugging it around.

  2. Nice review Paul, thank you. The pictures are still pretty good considering there was no tweaking involved. I am pretty sure when manually adjusted, they would look far better – sharpness in particular. Fuji is good in that. For common consumer they are much better than avarage in my view, and most people from that group would not pay attention to those minor technical imperfections. It is the content, not the perfection they will see. I am considering to buy this for our daughter due to her interest in photography. I think it will give her a good feel what are the possibilities as well as a good feeling for what a good camera can do.

    • Thanks, Frank. The camera is by no means perfect, but it does a good job for a camera in its price group. You can get better photo quality in a mirrorless camera, but you may pay quite a bit more — often more than $1,000. I purposely showed photos taken in less than ideal lighting to show what the camera can do in less than ideal conditions. And as you say, a little work in an editing suite would make them look a lot better.

      • Thank you Paul, a very fair comment I fully agree with. That’s the very reason to pick it as a starter unit. It will not break the bank, and at the same time it has enough”pro like” features to give some feedback and feel for the very beginner with some keen interest. And it can do some nice pictures, too. Even if a bit postprocessed.

Leave A Reply

CommentLuv badge